Member Login
User Name:
Password:
Register
Street Address
Suburb Postcode
STATE  Australia
Tel Phone
Fax Fax
Email Us

Celebrity Reviews

Francis Greenslade (Actor)
Moss Brothers Semillon 2004
 
Semillon as a variety has always intrigued me. Chardonnay has its own strong identity and you could never mistake a Sauvignon Blanc for a Reisling, (well I could but you get the idea) but Semillon has always seemed such an enigmatic wine. Like the next door neighbour you live next to for years, who you say good morning to every day, who keeps to himself and seems all right, quite nice really, until something cracks and he goes on a killing rampage in the mall........ perhaps not a good example.
Start again.
Until recently semillon was a wine that was really only seen in the company of sauvignon blanc - the second violin to the sauvignon blanc's crisp and aromatic first violin, never getting the starring role , always in support, playing away unnoticed, slightly jealous perhaps,brooding and resentful, until suddenly something cracks and she goes on a killing rampage in the mall....... I don¹t think this is going very well.
Talk about the wine.
My wine education was cursory. It began with the discovery that you could buy a bottle of wine for $1.98 and ended with the realisation that you shouldn't. It has not progressed much in the 20 years since that harsh lesson was learnt. However here's a tip I picked up recently. When you're asked to review a wine, don't do it when the house is being painted - the wine will have the bouquet of Dulux's "Chalk USA", slightly creamy with an aftertaste of turpentine.
So - Moss Brothers Semillon. A review by an oenological novice..
This wine goes splang firmly yet gently at the back of my mouth and plink plink pleasantly at the sides. Subsequent tastings reveal a glingling effect all around the mouthal area that demand further investigation until the bottle is empty. It reminds me of visiting wineries when I was young and irresponsible and makes me look forward to barbecues with friends when the children are old enough to get their own food and go to the toilet by themselves. It's clear and clean and citrussy and makes me want to run to the shops and buy the ingredients for fish soup and crusty bread and have people round so I can pour them glasses of Moss Brothers Semillon and say "Try this, I have alway found Semillon an enigmatic wine but this bottle has finally explained it all to me, what do you think?" Most importantly it makes me forget for a short yet blissful time, the awful paint smell. Which is just as well or otherwise something may crack and I might find myself on a killing rampage in the mall.
 
Phillip Gwynne (Author)
Moss Brothers Semillon Sauvignon Blanc 2004
 
I grew up surrounded by grapes.
Before your mind conjures a bucolic image of a child frolicking amongst lustrous bunches swaying in the breeze let me qualify that statement - I spent some of my peripatetic childhood in a town called Waikerie. Waikerie is in the Riverland area of South Australia and is not really famous for anything, except, perhaps, that it rhymes with Bakery. And yes, many a pastie and finger bun was purchased by my seven siblings and I from the Waikerie Bakery.

Waikerie is one of the reasons I’m writing this review. In fact, as the paucity of my oenological expertise becomes laughably evident it may well be the only reason I’m writing this review

You see, Jane Moss and I have Waikerie in common. Some of her peripatetic childhood was spent there, too. I’m not sure about her intake of pasties and finger buns but I have no doubt that she too patronized the Waikerie Bakery.
But let’s talk more about grapes.
We picked a lot in Waikerie. We picked oranges. We picked lemons. We picked peaches. We picked apricots (except we called them ‘cots). And we picked grapes. Picked isn’t really the right term, however. We cut grapes.

There’s an old grape picker’s joke. The novice grape picker asks the experienced grape picker how many years he’s been picking. He holds up four fingers to represent four years. He needs both hands to accomplish this.

In other words you had to be careful who you picked grapes with, who was on the other side of the vine, or you’d finish the day without the full digital complement.

Who did we pick grapes for? Famous companies like Yalumba or Seppelts. No we picked grapes for blockies. A blocky is a bloke who owns a block (of course). A block is an orchard. The grapes were invariably sultanas, or sullies as they were called.

My viticultural knowledge is of the same standard as my oenological expertise but it seemed to me (as I knelt down on the scorching sand) that these sullies were almost grown hydroponically – they were given lots of fertilizer and River Murray water and the sand was basically there to stop the vines from falling over.

I’m not sure what happened to the sullies we picked - maybe they ended up as table grapes, maybe they were dried, maybe they found their way into cask wine, but I do know that picking sullies was hard work. Really hard work. The sort of work that made you realise that your mother’s crazy idea that you should study harder at school wasn’t so crazy after all.

I can remember clearly the last day I picked sullies - February 16, 1983, more commonly known as Ash Wednesday. By ten the temperature was well over 45 and the northerly wind a super-heated blast from the outback. At lunchtime we quit and retreated to the river to watch the sky turn red and the sun turn green. Seventy-five people died in bushfires that day. And I quit picking sullies for good.

I’ve never been much of a drinker. Maybe that’s because I grew up with a father who was a serious one. He never drank wine though (or ‘plonk’ as he called it) and he didn’t trust anybody who did. If they weren’t a derro, a wog or a shelia then their manhood could be justifiably questioned. Or maybe it was because the first time I got drunk was at a winery. The Waikerie Junior Colts had just won the premiership and we were celebrating in style. Until our full-back (or was it our full-forward?) found you could quite easily slide open the top to one of the vats, dunk your head into the half-fermented liquid and imbibe.

So I invited some friends around – another writer, a lawyer, an actor, and a politician (ok, only joking about the politician – I may be hard up for friends but I’m not that hard up). They’re all serious wine drinkers. One of them even brought his own glass.
Let the tasting begin!
‘Gwynnie, it’s not cold enough,’ muttered the actor, doing a very good Nicole impersonation.

Jane, how could you do this to me? How could you give me wine that wasn’t cold enough? The lawyer pointed out (as lawyers tend to do) that this was probably my responsibility. The wine went back into the fridge.

It returned suitable chilled and the adjectives started to fly. You know what I mean, all those lovely-sounding technical terms that I don’t have a clue about. But everybody agreed it’s a ‘noice’ wine, it’s a lovely wine, it’s a credit to it’s maker.

And what should be eaten with such a splendid drop – a pasty and a finger bun from the Waikerie Bakery, of course.
 
Bryan Dawe (Actor)
Moss Brothers Cabernet Sauvignon Merlot 2001
 
Wine, someone bearing a more than abnormal resemblance to my good self, once observed: should be drunk not discussed – either orally or in print. There is good reason for this: there is a bewitching hour at night when, say after the fourth bottle of fine red such as this one, that any serious discussion about wine or anything for that matter, is undesirable and should be banned at any civilized table. Apart from anything else, at this stage of the night the conversation tends to descend less into intelligent discourse and more towards a series of slurred utterings – often around a repetitive motif. To the untrained ear, it can sound very much like a strange dialect from the Planet Zargon. This babbling and incoherence in turn restricts the physical act of pouring the contents of one’s glass down one’s throat and this is not helpful; for, it is my personal view that the glass of red wine you miss out on - is the one you never make up.

So, in an endeavour to review this gorgeous drop, I have therefore had to put aside my strongly held views on the above and by way of compromise: put down my glass and grudgingly comply with the request to put in print at least my assessment of the Cabernet Sauvignon Merlot 2001 The first known reference to a specific wine vintage was when the Roman Historian Pliny the Elder rated 121 B.C. as a vintage “of the highest excellence.” It was possibly the first wine review. Pliny the Elder wrote the history of the Roman Empire around 70 A.D. that made the wine he was ‘reviewing’ 200 years old.

Clearly the 121B.C. was a great year and the vintage aged well. Will the Cabernet Sauvignon Merlot 2001 do the same? I have no doubt. If I were you I would cease reading this immediately and purchase as much of this wine that you can lay your hands on. Buy it with your ears pinned back, it will be in great demand. This is not a wine to store as the Romans did. And there is always the risk that over such a prolonged period it might go off. This would be a tragedy. Turning to the wine itself. As Len Evans, once said: "You have only so many bottles in your life, never drink a bad one."

We have no fear of that here. On the contrary; unlike some wine which one can tell from the first whiff has never seen a grape in its life, this is a wine that sleeks out from the bottle, gliding down the throat like a sophisticated model along the catwalk of one’s mouth.

This is not one of those light, portable, discreet, and compact wines that fits into the pocket, purse, or wallet of one’s palate.

There’s nothing hidden nor squeezed in its aroma; retronasally, it is not a wine that skulks around in the dark corners of one’s mouth too shy to show its face; nor conversely does it creep up behind your palate and biff you; nor does it bring a large hammer down upon your skull at the first taste – or the next morning. It is a wine for dancers: ballerina’s not construction workers in singlets; it is the wine of poets not politicians. It should be drunk in the company of artists and writers not bankers and real estate agents. It’s flavour and colour will be lost on a footballer but never a craftsman.

Its aroma has the complexity of a Whitlam or Keating but none of a Howard or Ruddock.

It’s medicinal qualities are obvious: give this to the sick and they will recover.

It is to be poured at candle lit dinners not in ‘Clueless’ movies. A sculptor of bronze should drink this but not a 19 year old blond at the Logies. Paint the wine and it is a Whitely not a Ken Done.
A drink to enjoy in Venice, not in Vienna.
Cellar it for ten years, you’re joking aren’t you?
Now if you don’t mind I’d like to go back to drinking it.